Talk:WikiUpgrade: Difference between revisions
(add some note about favicon.ico and robots.txt) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
In monobook, the color of the Discussion tab would change if no one had created the discussion page yet. In Cavendish, you can't tell without actually clicking on the tab to see if there's anything there. --[[User:Justdave|Justdave]] 01:59, 19 Mar 2005 (PST) | In monobook, the color of the Discussion tab would change if no one had created the discussion page yet. In Cavendish, you can't tell without actually clicking on the tab to see if there's anything there. --[[User:Justdave|Justdave]] 01:59, 19 Mar 2005 (PST) | ||
Email addresses now show the entire mailto: link before the | Email addresses now show the entire mailto: link before the envelope icon, and spam-proofing them with & #64; doesn't work anymore. See [[SeaMonkey:Supporters]] --Sander 02:39, 19 Mar 2005 (PST) | ||
:This is probably related to the 1.4rc1 upgrade to MediaWiki, and not the theme. They appear to be being more anal about XSS-proofing the URLs. :) --[[User:Justdave|Justdave]] 02:59, 24 Mar 2005 (PST) | |||
The content area seems very much smaller than in other themes, can we tweak it somehow to get back some space there again? E.g. the left and right empty borders could be much smaller, and I guess the nac bar could be smaller as well (font size?). I wonder what it look like on a 800x600 screen... --[[User:KaiRo|KaiRo]] 10:22, 19 Mar 2005 (PST) | The content area seems very much smaller than in other themes, can we tweak it somehow to get back some space there again? E.g. the left and right empty borders could be much smaller, and I guess the nac bar could be smaller as well (font size?). I wonder what it look like on a 800x600 screen... --[[User:KaiRo|KaiRo]] 10:22, 19 Mar 2005 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 10:59, 24 March 2005
stuff that was put in pre's before to stand out like code now just flows inline which kind of looks like crap with the new css. --Pavlov 23:53, 18 Mar 2005 (PST)
- Does anyone have an example of what the PRE style used to look like? If so, I can get it setup --StevenGarrity
- Try Update:Development:Templates from the Google cache (use this Google search if the cache link doesn't work right). --Waldo 15:56, 19 Mar 2005 (PST)
On Special:Recentchanges the toolbox links (RSS and Atom) look weird - don't follow the cavandish style --Csogilvie 01:24, 19 Mar 2005 (PST)
In monobook, the color of the Discussion tab would change if no one had created the discussion page yet. In Cavendish, you can't tell without actually clicking on the tab to see if there's anything there. --Justdave 01:59, 19 Mar 2005 (PST)
Email addresses now show the entire mailto: link before the envelope icon, and spam-proofing them with & #64; doesn't work anymore. See SeaMonkey:Supporters --Sander 02:39, 19 Mar 2005 (PST)
- This is probably related to the 1.4rc1 upgrade to MediaWiki, and not the theme. They appear to be being more anal about XSS-proofing the URLs. :) --Justdave 02:59, 24 Mar 2005 (PST)
The content area seems very much smaller than in other themes, can we tweak it somehow to get back some space there again? E.g. the left and right empty borders could be much smaller, and I guess the nac bar could be smaller as well (font size?). I wonder what it look like on a 800x600 screen... --KaiRo 10:22, 19 Mar 2005 (PST)
On a 800x600 screen the edit page simply doesn't fit. L2 12:19, 20 Mar 2005 (PST)
The Go/Search buttons in the page header are incorrectly styled; they should look like the Go button in the main www.m.o style. --Waldo 16:51, 19 Mar 2005 (PST)
The default background color needs to be set to white, because the page doesn't look good if a user's default bg color is not white (bug 286939) --Biesi 06:48, 20 Mar 2005 (PST)
It's also a bit hard to navigate, as the main mav is in the middle between personal tools and toolbox and those sections are hard to tell apart.--KaiRo 08:08, 20 Mar 2005 (PST)
We need a favicon.ico and a robots.txt in the root and perhaps some <link> pointing to the favicon. Note that they really must be stored in the root otherwise it will generate a lot of useless 404s. -- Anne 11:15, 24 Mar 2005 (?, NL)
Resolved Issues
Page titles don't show up anywhere inside the page anymore (you have to look at the title bar :gasp: ). --Justdave 00:00, 19 Mar 2005 (PST)
- Fix for this is on its way. --StevenGarrity
- Fix received and installed. --Justdave 05:49, 20 Mar 2005 (PST)