Calendar:Status Meetings:2007-07-25: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<small><<[[Calendar:Status Meetings:2007-07- | <small><<[[Calendar:Status Meetings:2007-07-18| previous meeting]] | [[Calendar:Status Meetings|index]] | [[Calendar:Status Meetings:2007-08-01| next meeting >>]]</small> | ||
== Meeting Details == | == Meeting Details == | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
** sorting out the proposed 0.7? ones | ** sorting out the proposed 0.7? ones | ||
** we need to find responsible assignees for all 0.7+ | ** we need to find responsible assignees for all 0.7+ | ||
** targeting beginning of sept for RC1 | |||
** The [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=Calendar&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=RESOLVED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailqa_contact2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=2007-06-01&chfieldto=Now&chfield=bug_status&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Assignee&known_name=All+Unverified+Calendar+Bugs+%28since+June+07%29&query_based_on=All+Unverified+Calendar+Bugs+%28since+June+07%29&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= unverified since june list] grows and grows. How could we improve bug verification? | |||
=== Meeting Log === | |||
* Attendees: fallen, mschroeder, ctalbert, chris-j, mickey, daniel | |||
* proposed 0.7? ones: | |||
** If we have time/resources and somebody wants to take it or the bug is clearly blocking e.g. a crash → 0.7+ | |||
** If we clearly know we don't want or can't make it for 0.7 → 0.7- | |||
** The rest of 0.7? is kept as a pool of candidates to be used if we have time/resources left and will serve as a good basis for 0.9?. | |||
* We agreed on a feasible RC1 for mid of september. | |||
* It makes sense to timely verify bugs, although this is a trade-off with respect to further regressions. mschroeder plans to spend time on automatic tests (e.g. for base) that would help avoiding regressions. | |||
* Clint wants to spend more of his time on development and passes over the QA-lead hat to Martin Schroeder; we should support Martin as best as we can. | |||
Latest revision as of 08:46, 26 July 2007
<< previous meeting | index | next meeting >>
Meeting Details
- Wednesday, July 25th, 16:00 UTC
- Phone meeting
- Join #calendar-mtg on irc.mozilla.org for attendance
Telephone Info
- Toll free numbers
- US/Canada: 866-692-3163
- Netherlands: 0800-020-1392
- Germany: 0800-000-3441
- Participant Passcode
- 3182189
- Conference controls
- Press *1 private help menu
- Press *6 mute or un-mute individual line
- Each time you say something, please say your name first so people know who's speaking
Agenda Items
- Tracking 0.7
- sorting out the proposed 0.7? ones
- we need to find responsible assignees for all 0.7+
- targeting beginning of sept for RC1
- The unverified since june list grows and grows. How could we improve bug verification?
Meeting Log
- Attendees: fallen, mschroeder, ctalbert, chris-j, mickey, daniel
- proposed 0.7? ones:
- If we have time/resources and somebody wants to take it or the bug is clearly blocking e.g. a crash → 0.7+
- If we clearly know we don't want or can't make it for 0.7 → 0.7-
- The rest of 0.7? is kept as a pool of candidates to be used if we have time/resources left and will serve as a good basis for 0.9?.
- We agreed on a feasible RC1 for mid of september.
- It makes sense to timely verify bugs, although this is a trade-off with respect to further regressions. mschroeder plans to spend time on automatic tests (e.g. for base) that would help avoiding regressions.
- Clint wants to spend more of his time on development and passes over the QA-lead hat to Martin Schroeder; we should support Martin as best as we can.