WebOfThings/WorkshopSep2015: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(correction of name)
(Added more detail to "Areas of opportunity identified")
 
Line 12: Line 12:
* Summary of Findings
* Summary of Findings
** Currently active projects are bridging the Web platform and popular microcontrollers, Firefox OS developer boards, device-to-device interaction and content delivery, connecting the Web to fabrication tools.
** Currently active projects are bridging the Web platform and popular microcontrollers, Firefox OS developer boards, device-to-device interaction and content delivery, connecting the Web to fabrication tools.
** Areas of opportunity identified: Lowering barrier to entry for developers and makers, standardization on existing trusted infrastructure, bridging maker and Web developer communities, using education and advocacy to influence consumers/industry/government behavior, reduce app exhaustion, service and data management, there’s no clear pathway from hobby/maker/DIY development and productization/scale.
** Areas of opportunity identified:
*** Lowering barrier to entry for developers, makers and hardware vendors.
*** Standardization on existing trusted infrastructure.
*** Bridging maker and Web developer communities.
*** Allowing web-based identity providers (facebook, google, Firefox Accounts) to handle logins to IoT devices.
*** Reduce app exhaustion by enabling IoT to work through the browser rather than require dedicated app.
*** Using education and advocacy to influence consumers/industry/government behavior.
*** Service and data management.
*** There’s no clear pathway from hobby/maker/DIY development and productization/scale.
** Challenges identified: Early/large movers pushing verticalization for consumers, Mozilla has no established credibility in IoT, difficult to conceptually bridge Web technologies with local/direct device interaction and development, no over-arching theme in Mozilla’s current activity, the categories of activity are extremely diverse (maker vs consumer products vs enterprise/industrial).
** Challenges identified: Early/large movers pushing verticalization for consumers, Mozilla has no established credibility in IoT, difficult to conceptually bridge Web technologies with local/direct device interaction and development, no over-arching theme in Mozilla’s current activity, the categories of activity are extremely diverse (maker vs consumer products vs enterprise/industrial).
** Manifesto principles #4, #5 and #6 are relevant to IoT. They should inform our product designs, and can be differentiators.
** Manifesto principles #4, #5 and #6 are relevant to IoT. They should inform our product designs, and can be differentiators.

Latest revision as of 18:20, 21 September 2015

Summary